Durvalumab with cetuximab and radiotherapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A phase 1/2 trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To report on the anti-tumor activity of a novel combination in high-risk locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: At a fixed dose of 1500 mg every 28 days, anti PD-L1 Durvalumab was given concomitantly to Radiotherapy and Cetuximab starting from the first week of combined treatment, followed by adjuvant Durvalumab to a maximum of 6 months after completion of radiation. The primary endpoint of the study was 2-year progression-free survival (PFS). A safety run-in was planned. Due to regulatory issues which prevented from opening multiple centers, COVID-19 pandemic and withdrawal of Durvalumab from supporting company, the study was prematurely terminated in April 2021. RESULTS: Between July 2019 and August 2020, 9 patients were enrolled in the study. All tumors had a PD-L1 Combined Positive Score > 1. Optimal drug exposure was observed, with mean relative dose intensity of 85.5% and 87.5% for Cetuximab and Durvalumab, respectively. No radiation breaks were necessary. A grade 4 mucositis lasting for 14 days corresponded to the only dose limiting toxicity we reported. At a median follow-up of 11.5 months (IQR 7.7-16.7) all surviving patients (6 out of 9) are disease-free, with 1 and 2-year PFS rates of 77.7% and 58.3%, respectively. A selective sparing of node levels in the elective volume was performed in all cases, yielding a cumulative mean dose of 37.6 Gy (SD 8.4). CONCLUSION: Albeit limited by the small sample size, our preliminary observation of anti-tumor activity and tolerability of Durvalumab in addition to Cetuximab and radiation may warrant further investigations.

European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology Advisory Committee in Radiation Oncology Practice consensus recommendations on patient selection and dose and fractionation for external beam radiotherapy in early breast cancer.

High-quality randomised clinical trials testing moderately fractionated breast radiotherapy have clearly shown that local control and survival is at least as effective as with 2 Gy daily fractions with similar or reduced normal tissue toxicity. Fewer treatment visits are welcomed by patients and their families, and reduced fractions produce substantial savings for health-care systems. Implementation of hypofractionation, however, has moved at a slow pace. The oncology community have now reached an inflection point created by new evidence from the FAST-Forward five-fraction randomised trial and catalysed by the need for the global radiation oncology community to unite during the COVID-19 pandemic and rapidly rethink hypofractionation implementation. The aim of this paper is to support equity of access for all patients to receive evidence-based breast external beam radiotherapy and to facilitate the translation of new evidence into routine daily practice. The results from this European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology Advisory Committee in Radiation Oncology Practice consensus state that moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy can be offered to any patient for whole breast, chest wall (with or without reconstruction), and nodal volumes. Ultrafractionation (five fractions) can also be offered for non-nodal breast or chest wall (without reconstruction) radiotherapy either as standard of care or within a randomised trial or prospective cohort. The consensus is timely; not only is it a pragmatic framework for radiation oncologists, but it provides a measured proposal for the path forward to influence policy makers and empower patients to ensure equity of access to evidence-based radiotherapy.

Management of prostate cancer radiotherapy during the COVID-19 pandemic: A necessary paradigm change.

PURPOSE: To adapt the management of prostate malignancy in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: In according to the recommendations of the European Association of Urology, we have developed practical additional document on the treatment of prostate cancer. RESULTS: Low-Risk Group Watchful Waiting should be offered to patients >75 years old, with a limited life expectancy and unfit for local treatment. In Active Surveillance (AS) patients re-biopsy, PSA evaluation and visits should be deferred for up to 6 months, preferring non-invasive multiparametric-MRI. The active treatment should be delayed for 6-12 months. Intermediate-Risk Group AS should be offered in favorable-risk patients. Short-course neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with ultra-hypo-fractionation radiotherapy should be used in unfavorable-risk patients. High-Risk Group Neoadjuvant ADT combined with moderate hypofractionation should be preferred. Whole-pelvis irradiation should be offered to patients with positive lymph nodes in locally advanced setting. ADT should be initiated if PSA doubling time is < 12 months in radio-recurrent patients, as well as in low priority/low volume of metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer. If radiotherapy cannot be delayed, hypo-fractionated regimens should be preferred. In high priority class metastatic disease, treatment with androgen receptor-targeted agents should be offered. When palliative radiotherapy for painful bone metastasis is required, single fraction of 8 Gy should be offered. CONCLUSIONS: In Covid-19 Era, the challenge should concern a correct management of the oncologic patient, reducing the risk of spreading the virus without worsening tumor prognosis.